Observations and Questions:
In many aspects, the very axioms of the academics at the SUTL campus have fallen prey to the pragmatic of student demands for content and assessment targets, and the structure of conversional instruction week-by-week as face-to-face teaching.
Several observations emanate, as one who has used this system:
· Emphasis on learning objectives (Paterson & Weal, 1995) – however, students take little notice of these objectives;
· Explicit content – expressing important ideas, readings and self-assessment requiring considerable development by the academic and no development by the student;
· A 1999 quality review indicates that very few of the learning guides published, display the degree of completeness, implicit, in the Learning Materials Specification;
· Students at undergraduate level display behaviour similar to that expected in a performance based or goal oriented learning mode, and a reluctance to undertake cognitive and reflexive learning;
· A reluctance by academics to make use of online delivery as an alternative flexible mode or instructional technology.
Several broad questions emanate. Questions that help focus the wider research, in part reported in this paper. They are:
· What needs to change in the learning guide model in order to activate self-directed learning by the undergraduate students?
· Can online computer-mediated learning provide a “significant (non-detrimental) difference” for students choosing this mode of study?
· Can online computer-mediated learning be developed to a stage where stu
上一页 [1] [2]